May 13, 2021
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), drawing their interpretation from the 1964 Civil Rights Act Title VII, states that an employer may not use an employment or hiring practice that, even though neutral on its face and applied to all applicants or employees equally, disproportionately impacts members of protected categories, including divisions by gender, race, disability or veteran status.
The TTI Success Insights 2021 disparate impact study examined behaviors, motivators, Hartman, DNA 23, DNA 25, and Emotional Quotient assessments to determine whether our assessments create any posibility of contributing significant differences with regard to relevant protected classes during an employment or hiring process. This USA only study found that significant contributions related to the tools themselves are unlikely to be introduced.
Apr 4, 2019
This in-depth study of 500 nonprofit marketing and fundraisers compares and contrasts executives, mid-management and practitioners by examining behaviors, motivators and acumen. This case study provides a template for other studies in other fields.
Apr 2, 2019
Our regularly updated adverse impact studies provide evidence that our assessments offer equal opportunities for all protected groups. This Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) definition includes: gender, race, disability and Veteran status.
Apr 2, 2019
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), drawing their interpretation from the 1964 Civil Rights Act Title VII, states that an employer may not use an employment or hiring practice that, even though neutral on its face and applied to all applicants or employees equally, disproportionately impacts members of protected categories, including divisions by gender, race, disability or veteran status.
The TTI Success Insights 2019 disparate impact study examined behaviors, motivators, Hartman, DNA 23 and DNA 25 to determine whether our assessments created any possibility of contributing significant differences with regard to relevant protected classes during an employment or hiring process. This USA only study found that significant contributions related to the tools themselves are unlikely to be introduced.
