A Correlational Study: Dispositional Style and Innovative Work Behavior of Educators in a K-12 High Performing Charter School By Dana Knight Reyes

A Correlational Study: Dispositional Style and Innovative Work Behavior of Educators in a K-12 High Performing Charter School By Dana Knight Reyes

This study examined the relationship between predominant dispositional styles and innovative work behaviors of educators in a high performing K-12 charter school in Colorado. The results indicated no significant correlation between the two variables. Further research is recommended to gain generalizable understanding about this potential correlation between individual level characteristics of educators in high performing charter schools that could translate into scalable strategies to include attracting and hiring and developing people who have a predisposition to innovate.

A Critical Examination of the Construct Validity of the TTI Performance DNA™️ Survey for the Purpose of Differentiating the Entrepreneurially-Minded Engineer By Sandra L. Dietrich

A Critical Examination of the Construct Validity of the TTI Performance DNA™️ Survey for the Purpose of Differentiating the Entrepreneurially-Minded Engineer By Sandra L. Dietrich

This research examined the construct validity of the TTI survey and its ability to distinguish between engineers and entrepreneurially-minded engineers (EMEs). It is reasonable to conclude that time on the job does not affect behaviors, values and professional skills of engineers. Further, considering graduate degree attainment, only one professional skill is found to be significantly different: presenting. Therefore, graduate degree attainment does not affect behaviors, values and professional skills of engineers.

2019 Adverse Impact

2019 Adverse Impact

Our regularly updated adverse impact studies provide evidence that our assessments offer equal opportunities for all protected groups. This Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) definition includes: gender, race, disability and Veteran status.

2019 Adverse Impact

Adverse Impact

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), drawing their interpretation from the 1964 Civil Rights Act Title VII, states that an employer may not use an employment or hiring practice that, even though neutral on its face and applied to all applicants or employees equally, disproportionately impacts members of protected categories, including divisions by gender, race, disability or veteran status.

The TTI Success Insights 2019 disparate impact study examined behaviors, motivators, Hartman, DNA 23 and DNA 25 to determine whether our assessments created any possibility of contributing significant differences with regard to relevant protected classes during an employment or hiring process. This USA only study found that significant contributions related to the tools themselves are unlikely to be introduced.